PGMOL admit referee messed up as Chelsea and Man Utd big winners from VAR controversies

VAR WATCH: Mirror Football takes a look at some key decisions from gameweek three as the Premier League’s Video Assistant Referee continues to spark controversy

PGMOL admitted VAR got a big call wrong during Chelsea vs Fulham(Image: Mike Hewitt, Getty Images)

We are now three weeks into the 2025/26 Premier League season and VAR controversies are showing no signs of slowing down. Inconsistency in refereeing has been the biggest cause of fan frustration so far this season.

Among the plethora of contentious decisions have been Eberechi Eze’s free-kick goal being ruled out on matchday one and James Tarkowski’s bizarre handball verdict. But despite repeated calls by fans and pundits to simplify refereeing and for less VAR involvement, this weekend produced arguably the biggest outrage yet.

As VAR and the PMGOL’s refereeing standards continue to be scrutinised, Mirror Football takes a look at the major incidents from this weekend’s action, including the key decisions both Chelsea and Manchester United benefitted from.

READ MORE: Alan Shearer sensationally tears into Howard Webb after being personally embarrassed by VARREAD MORE: Fulham star risks wrath of Premier League chiefs with furious rant on VAR controversy

Howard Webb admits error

Rodrigo Muniz stands on the boot of Trevoh Chalobah, leading to Josh King's goal being disallowed.
Fulham had their opener brutally ruled out after a VAR intervention(Image: TNT Sports)

Saturday’s early Premier League kick-off saw Fulham open the scoring in the 22nd minute at Stamford Bridge, with Josh King netting against west London rivals Chelsea. But the goal was chalked off due to an apparent foul on Trevoh Chalobah by Rodrigo Muniz, to the fury of the visitors.

Referee Robert Jones declared to the entire stadium that Rodrigo Muniz had made a „careless challenge“ and stepped on Trevoh Chalobah’s foot during the build-up, a call many viewers considered extremely harsh. To add insult to injury for Fulham, the Blues‘ opener in their 2-0 win came nine minutes into eight minutes of added time at the end of the first half, leaving fans furious as the outcome of the game was very much decided by an unnecessary call.

Referees chief Howard Webb contacted Fulham after the game and acknowledged the decision was incorrect. He admitted the call to disallow the goal did not reach the high bar of a VAR intervention as it was not a clear and obvious error by the referee, and should have gone down as a ‚referees‘ call‘ instead.

Referees‘ body PGMOL consequently replaced VAR culprit Michael Salisbury with John Brooks for Liverpool vs Arsenal on. However, that did little to quell the anger towards VAR and how it’s implemented.

Fulham defender Antonee Robinson post-match called out the Premier League’s VAR, calling the level of officiating in the Premier League „shocking.“

Fulham dealt another blow by VAR

Ryan Sessegnon blocks Trevoh Chalobah's delivery with a raised arm
Ryan Sessegnon was penalised for a handball in the box(Image: TNT Sports)

In the 52nd minute of the same game, the referee overturned his original decision of no penalty to Chelsea after the ball was blocked by Ryan Sessegnon in the box. Sessegnon’s arm was raised away from his body and VAR’s decision to overturn Jones’ original call should have been an easy one.

But they took three-and-a-half minutes to reach a straight-forward decision, only feeding the narrative of uncertainty and unease surrounding VAR intervention. The correct outcome simply took too long to reach.

Man Utd’s penalty decisions

Jaidon Anthony pulls the shirt of Amad as he tries to run onto Bruno Fernandes' pass.
Manchester United received another penalty this weekend(Image: ESPN)

Referee Sam Barrott awarded a penalty to Manchester United in the 16th minute of their clash with Burnley, when Kyle Walker was judged to have brought down Mason Mount. It was checked by the VAR, Stuart Attwell, and the penalty was cancelled due to minimal contact.

Lyle Foster of Burnley thought he had equalised in the 59th minute, but the offside flag went up. Semi-automated offside determined that most of Foster’s upper arm was offside – a part of the body which is legal to play the ball with.

In the second minute of stoppage time, at the end of the game, Amad went to ground inside the box, with Barrott ignoring United’s appeals for a shirt pull.

However, VAR deemed that there was enough pulling on the United winger’s shirt to warrant a penalty, which Bruno Fernandes scored in the 97th minute to earn his side a crucial win. VAR on this occasion successfully did what it was brought into the game to do.

PGMOL continue crackdown

Reinildo Mandava has no interest in playing the ball when he wrestles Nathan Collins to the floor
Reinildo Mandava had no interest in playing the ball when he wrestled Nathan Collins to the floor(Image: ESPN)

Brentford were awarded a penalty against Sunderland around the hour mark when Nathan Collins went to ground at the back post during a corner, with referee Anthony Taylor pointing to the spot. Following the correct call by VAR to stick with Taylor’s decision, after Reinildo Mandava clearly held Collins, Kevin Schade’s effort was saved by Robin Roefs.

Sunderland were then awarded their own penalty in the 82nd minute after Rico Henry pulled down Habib Diarra. VAR Darren England again stuck with Taylor’s decision to award a spot-kick, which although was softer than the first, was not enough of a clear and obvious error to be overturned.

The two decisions demonstrated that PGMOL are still enforcing their clamp down on unfair grappling inside the box, which was a point raised ahead of the new season.

Webb said about the rule’s implementation: „What we’ve said to the officials is, if you get one of those extreme situations where one player is clearly dragging another one to the floor in an extreme non-footballing action, even if it’s off the ball, we expect either the referee to see it or, if it’s a clear one, then the VAR will will intervene and recommend the referee looks at it at the screen because it fits the criteria that we’ve laid out.“

Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.

Sky Sports discounted Premier League and EFL package

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
Content Image

£43

£35

Sky

Get the deal here

Sky has slashed the price of its Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle ahead of the 2025/26 season, saving members £192 and offering more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.

Sky will show at least 215 live Premier League games next season, an increase of up to 100 more.

Ersten Kommentar schreiben

Antworten

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht.


*